Published on March 21, 2026

AEGIS: ИИ для обнаружения аномалий, который учится вместе с экспертом

AEGIS: How LG Taught AI to Detect Anomalies Alongside Experts, Not Instead of Them

LG AI Research has introduced AEGIS – an industrial anomaly detection system that learns from experts during operation and adapts to real manufacturing conditions.

Research 5 – 7 minutes min read
Event Source: LG AI Research 5 – 7 minutes min read

Most anomaly detection systems in manufacturing operate on a single principle: a model is trained on historical data, launched, and is expected to perform well. However, real factories and production lines do not operate under ideal laboratory conditions. New types of defects appear, equipment changes, and experts accumulate experience that is difficult to formalize and even more difficult to transfer to a machine. The gap between what the model can do and what a human specialist knows only widens over time.

This is precisely the problem the LG AI Research team tackled. At the AAAI 2026 conference, they introduced a system called AEGIS – and its main idea is not to replace the expert, but to continuously learn from them directly during operation.

Почему модель машинного обучения устаревает на производстве

Why «Train Once» Doesn't Work

Industrial anomaly data is, by definition, rare. You are lucky to find a dozen defective items for every thousand normal ones. And new types of defects appear unexpectedly: when a batch of raw materials changes, a piece of equipment wears out, or the production process is altered.

Classical machine learning approaches quickly become obsolete under these conditions. A model trained on last year's data might not recognize an anomaly that was first encountered just last week. Retraining it from scratch every time is expensive and time-consuming.

At the same time, there is another problem: experts on the production floor can notice things that are not in the training data. But their knowledge typically remains in their heads – or, at best, in the form of instructions that the model cannot read.

Система, которая продолжает развиваться после запуска

A System That Doesn't Stand Still After Deployment

AEGIS is designed to continue evolving even after it has been deployed in a real production environment. Simply put, it doesn't just analyze incoming data – it includes a human in the learning loop.

When the system encounters something unusual, it doesn't just issue a verdict. It flags the uncertainty and asks an expert for labeling. The specialist looks at the object, says, «this is a defect» or «this is normal», and the system uses this information to adjust its performance. Gradually, the model becomes more accurate specifically on the data that a particular production facility deals with.

This approach is called active learning – where the model itself chooses what to ask the expert about, rather than receiving labeled data in random batches. This saves specialists' time: they answer truly important questions instead of manually sifting through thousands of examples.

Как ИИ учится новому без катастрофического забывания

Memory Without Forgetting – Harder Than It Seems

Herein lies one of the most difficult technical challenges faced by all continual learning systems. When a model learns from new data, it often «forgets» what it knew before. In the research community, this is called catastrophic forgetting.

Imagine a system has learned to recognize scratches on metal well. Then, it is further trained on data for a different type of defect. Now, it handles the new one well, but its performance on the old one has degraded. In a manufacturing setting, this is unacceptable.

In AEGIS, special attention was paid to this problem. The system is designed to integrate new knowledge into the existing base without destroying it. This is achieved through a special architecture and mechanisms that preserve the «memory» of previous defect classes when adding new ones.

Обнаружение новых дефектов, которых ранее не было в данных

Defects No One Has Seen Before

A separate challenge is the so-called zero-shot anomalies. These are situations where a new type of defect has just appeared, and the system has no samples for training.

Classical models simply don't know what to do in this case. AEGIS approaches the task differently: the system relies on text descriptions from experts. A specialist can say, «look for this type of deviation», and the system will try to find it, even without seeing any examples. This is made possible by using multimodal models that can correlate text descriptions with visual data.

Simply put, if an expert can describe a defect in words, the system will try to find it. This significantly reduces the time between «we've discovered a new problem» and «the system can detect it.»

Применение системы AEGIS на практике: результаты и эффективность

How This Works in Practice

The LG AI Research team tested AEGIS not only on standard test datasets but also in conditions simulating real industrial operation: with a gradual influx of new defect classes, limited labeling, and expert involvement in the process.

The results showed that the system consistently maintains accuracy on known defect types while simultaneously learning new ones – which is non-trivial in itself. In traditional approaches, this is almost always a trade-off: either you remember the old well, or you learn the new quickly.

Moreover, the workload on experts was significantly lower than with manual labeling: active learning allows the system to «ask» only about cases where it is genuinely uncertain.

Новая модель взаимодействия ИИ и человека на производстве

What's Behind This – Looking at the Bigger Picture

AEGIS is not just another defect detector. It is an attempt to build a different model of interaction between AI and experts in manufacturing.

Most industrial AI systems are designed to be static: train, deploy, use. Human operators are left out of the picture – they interact with the system but do not influence its development. AEGIS proposes a different principle: the system and the expert grow together, and the knowledge of one is gradually integrated into the knowledge of the other.

This also changes how we should think about implementing AI in manufacturing. Not «set it and forget it», but «set it and continually improve it together.» On the one hand, this requires more conscious participation from specialists. On the other hand, it makes the system significantly more dynamic and adaptive to the conditions of a specific facility.

The question of how well this approach scales to different types of production and how easily it can be adapted to conditions vastly different from AEGIS's testing environment remains open. But the direction seems logical – especially for industries where defects are costly, data is scarce, and experts still know more than any model.

Original Title: [AAAI 2026] AEGIS: An industry anomaly detection system evolving alongside field experts
Publication Date: Mar 19, 2026
LG AI Research www.lgresearch.ai A South Korean research division developing AI models for LG products and technologies.
Previous Article Why AI Agents Fail Without Context and What to Do About It Next Article RL-Studio: A Reinforcement Learning Research Platform Presented at AAAI 2026

Related Publications

You May Also Like

Explore Other Events

Events are only part of the bigger picture. These materials help you see more broadly: the context, the consequences, and the ideas behind the news.

From Source to Analysis

How This Text Was Created

This material is not a direct retelling of the original publication. First, the news item itself was selected as an event important for understanding AI development. Then a processing framework was set: what needs clarification, what context to add, and where to place emphasis. This allowed us to turn a single announcement or update into a coherent and meaningful analysis.

Neural Networks Involved in the Process

We openly show which models were used at different stages of processing. Each performed its own role — analyzing the source, rewriting, fact-checking, and visual interpretation. This approach maintains transparency and clearly demonstrates how technologies participated in creating the material.

1.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic Analyzing the Original Publication and Writing the Text The neural network studies the original material and generates a coherent text

1. Analyzing the Original Publication and Writing the Text

The neural network studies the original material and generates a coherent text

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic
2.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Google DeepMind step.translate-en.title

2. step.translate-en.title

Gemini 2.5 Pro Google DeepMind
3.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google DeepMind Text Review and Editing Correction of errors, inaccuracies, and ambiguous phrasing

3. Text Review and Editing

Correction of errors, inaccuracies, and ambiguous phrasing

Gemini 2.5 Flash Google DeepMind
4.
DeepSeek-V3.2 DeepSeek Preparing the Illustration Description Generating a textual prompt for the visual model

4. Preparing the Illustration Description

Generating a textual prompt for the visual model

DeepSeek-V3.2 DeepSeek
5.
FLUX.2 Pro Black Forest Labs Creating the Illustration Generating an image based on the prepared prompt

5. Creating the Illustration

Generating an image based on the prepared prompt

FLUX.2 Pro Black Forest Labs

Want to know about new
experiments first?

Subscribe to our Telegram channel — we share all the latest
and exciting updates from NeuraBooks.

Subscribe